One Nation, One Election (ONOE)

 



 One Nation, One Election: Because Who Doesn’t Love a Good Combo Deal?

Imagine if every few months your boss asked you to come in on a weekend to vote… not for a raise, but for people who promise they’ll maybe think about getting you better roads (eventually). Now multiply that by dozens of elections over five years. Exhausting, right? Enter India’s grand political brainchild: One Nation, One Election — like a political Kumbh Mela, but with more manifestos and fewer elephants.

What Is It, Exactly?

In short, One Nation, One Election (ONOE) proposes that all elections — Lok Sabha (national), state assemblies, maybe even panchayat — be held simultaneously. One big voting bonanza every five years. You pick your MLA, MP, and probably your next-door ward member — all in one epic trip to the polling booth.

Imagine the ultimate combo platter: a democracy thali.

 Why Is This Being Proposed?

  1. Save Money: India spends crores (that’s lots of zeroes) on elections. Security, EVMs, ink, rallies, speeches, helicopters, snacks… okay maybe not snacks, but it adds up.

  2. Save Time: With elections happening year-round, governance takes a coffee break. Code of Conduct kicks in, and everyone in office suddenly forgets how to approve a pothole fix because they’re too busy campaigning.

  3. Stop the Circus: The non-stop cycle of electioneering turns democracy into a daily soap — with dramatic walkouts, emotional speeches, and surprise plot twists.

 The Plot Holes (a.k.a. Challenges)

But wait, this isn’t a Bollywood script where everything magically works out after the interval.

  • What if a government falls early? Do we have a re-election just for that state, or wait till 2029?

  • Different states, different issues: Voters might confuse national and local issues. Auntie wants better drainage in Bihar, not foreign policy from Delhi.

  • Constitutional gymnastics: You’ll need to amend multiple articles. The Constitution is many things, but “easy to edit like a Google Doc” is not one of them.

 What Do the Experts Say?

  • Some love it: “It’s efficient! Less money! More governance!”

  • Some are skeptical: “Centralization much? Also, what if people vote straight ticket and local voices get lost in the Modi/Mamata/Rahul wave?”

Basically, ONOE could be either a masterstroke of efficiency or a high-risk political Tetris game.

When Will It Happen?

There have been committees, debates, white papers, and more committees. The government even floated a High-Level Committee headed by former President Ram Nath Kovind to examine it. So... it's still cooking in the political kitchen. Whether it'll be served hot anytime soon is TBD.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lord Canning

Image
  Once upon a terribly tense time in colonial India, in 1856, the British decided to promote a chill, balanced aristocrat to the top job. Enter: Lord Charles Canning , Governor-General of India (1856–1862), and later the first Viceroy . Canning thought he’d signed up for a civil service upgrade. Instead, he got… a full-blown rebellion, chaos, and angry sepoys armed with muskets and a grudge.  Chapter 1: Welcome to the Revolt of 1857 – Here’s Your Fire Extinguisher Barely a year into his term, the entire subcontinent decided to go full Revolt Mode . What started as a sepoy mutiny over greased cartridges (made from cow and pig fat – a double no-no for Hindus and Muslims) quickly snowballed into: Disgruntled princes (thanks, Doctrine of Lapse ) Angry landlords (thanks, British land revenue systems ) And a public ready to say, “No taxation without less disrespect.” And there was Lord Canning, stuck in the middle, holding a teacup and asking, “So…what’s the protocol for ...
Read more

Warren Hastings

Image
  Once upon a time in 18th-century England, there lived a man named Warren Hastings , who looked in the mirror one day and thought, “Hmm, I could run a country.” The British East India Company agreed. So, they sent him off to India , which, back then, was less “Incredible India” and more “We’re being taken over by a trading company.” Hastings packed his wigs, tight breeches, and possibly some digestive biscuits, and sailed off to rule. Now, Hastings wasn’t your average colonial bureaucrat. He was the first Governor-General of Bengal (1773), which basically meant he got the official title for doing what the Company had been unofficially doing — running large parts of India like their personal startup. Upon arrival, Hastings found chaos: nawabs, rival British officials, and accountants who couldn’t count. The East India Company’s board back in London had told him, “Fix it, but don’t spend too much.” Classic boss move. So what did Hastings do? He: Centralized administration (becau...
Read more

Muslim League (1906)

Image
  By the turn of the 20th century, the Indian National Congress had been around for two decades. It was supposed to be the polite dinner party where Indians and Brits discussed reforms over tea and biscuits. But slowly, things got a bit loud, a bit radical, and a lot more annoying for the British. Meanwhile, Indian Muslims—who formed around a quarter of the population—were watching from the sidelines, thinking, “Should we be at this party, or are we going to end up being dessert?” And thus began the Muslim political awakening , driven by equal parts concern, ambition, and British encouragement (read: manipulation). The British Role: Divide, Distract, and Delegate If the British Raj had a motto, it would’ve been: “Why deal with one angry group when you can create two?” They saw a golden opportunity to split the rising nationalist tide . And what better way than to subtly convince Muslim elites that their future might not lie with the Congress, but in a separate lane altogether? Lor...
Read more